Virtual Bowling Zen from A2Ethics

If you’re an organizer scrambling to pull together virtual bowl training materials, take a deep breath, strike your favorite yoga pose, and click here. Michigan HSEB organizer Jeanine DeLay and her team at A2Ethics offer a relaxing, reassuring judge training video sure to chillax volunteers and participants worldwide.

One of the things we love about A2Ethics – their style! Here’s Jeanine encouraging judge trainees to stand and stretch.

If you’re an organizer, Jeannine can empathize with the worries that keep you up at night, likening bowl coordination to “mosquito control at a nudist camp.” Luckily we learn from one another’s mistakes and build on one another’s successes. Past problems have inspired redundant point-tallying officials, recruiting, courting and training more volunteers than needed, and in Michigan this year implementation of a new alternate judging system.

While only three judges’ score sheets will be counted, four judges will log into Zoom to view and score each match. Why? If one of the official judges’ computers decides bowl time is the perfect time for a forced reboot, the alternate judge will be promoted, their scores included in the totals. Tada! Simple, seamless, effective.

One note: the scoring interface featured in the video is unique to the Michigan Bowl. I’ve tested it and it works great – suspect creator Wayne Eaker of Zengenuity, Inc would be willing to discuss how to do something similar at your bowl if interested. Thanks for your devotion and leadership, Jeanine and team! The best of luck with your upcoming V-Bowl.

That familiar match format, even if via an unfamiliar platform

Have your own virtual bowl disaster avoidance ideas? New virtual bowling materials others might benefit from? Share in a comment or shoot me an email and we’ll get the word out in an article – collaboration and cooperation are what ethics bowl is all about.

Introducing NHSEBAcademy

Our friends at the Parr Center have been busy, recently launching the brand new all-online NHSEBAcademy. The best part? Live, Zoom-based bowling clinics. The first two are scheduled for later this week (register here). Depending on how interactive they are, this could be a game-changer. But wait, there’s more!

I believe that’s our friend Kyle Robertson at UC Santa Cruz featured on the organizer kit image. Looking good, Kyle!

The Library contains zip files packed with material tailored for teams, coaches, judges and organizers. You can download the current NHSEB rules and guidelines, case pool, score sheet and rubric (coaches and teams – don’t overlook those scoring criteria!), and even moderator scripts. Resources planned for future release include a guide to coaching a bowl during COVID (tip: buy a webcam), a manual for organizers interested in growing their bowl (I have an older version from my time as the original NHSEB Director of Outreach – email if you can’t wait for the new one), and “Ethics Bowl in Class: Resources for the Classroom and Beyond.”

The Theater includes an “Ethical Reasoning Toolkit” playlist beginning with a vid by Yale’s Kelley Schiffman. Prof Schiffman deftly distinguishes between descriptive and normative claims, and is followed by an exploration of the nature and moral implications of consent. While the consent vid uses the language of rights far too much (rights claims are too clunky for quality ethics bowl work), it’s redeemed by a cookie-eating illustration. Cookies cure all, and since we’re bashing rights claims, I hereby proclaim a universal human right to Toll House chocolate chip lovers cookies.

The second playlist, “Arguing About Morality,” begins with a vid similar to the descriptive vs. normative distinction from the first list, only this time delivered by John Corvino and focusing on facts vs. opinions. Corvino next overviews how arguments by analogy work, and how to analyze them. Arguments by analogy are common and persuasive – a team’s entire bowling strategy could be built on them (a possible strategy for my own team…).

The library and theater are certain to benefit teams, coaches, judges and volunteers. But the most welcome, innovative and value-adding feature is NHSEBAcademy Live.  

NHSEBAcademy Live is a new series of specially-designed online events for NHSEB students, coaches, organizers, and volunteers. These programs will provide new ways to engage with Ethics Bowl content, mechanics, and skills. Our full schedule of events is below, and more will be added throughout the Fall and Winter in the lead up to NHSEB Regional Season.

NHSEBAcademy.org/live

First up is a new ethics bowl clinic scheduled for Thursday, Oct 22nd from 3-4:30 EST and Saturday, Oct 24th from 4:30-6 EST (the second will be a repeat of the first). The workshops promise to cover “presentation techniques, responsive commentaries, practice Q+A sessions, and more.” Registration is required and will enable access to the Zoom link. If you check it out, let us know how it went. We may digitally bump into one another at the Saturday session.

Thanks, UNC, for this innovation. Looking forward to all the Academy has to offer. Readers can check it out via the menu at NHSEB.unc.edu or by clicking here.

Introducing NHSEB Online

Last week National High School Ethics Bowl Director Alex Richardson shared the following with regional organizers. Reprinted here in full (with complementary video) Alex outlines the move of NHSEB online, includes links to several engaging resources, and (unless I’m misreading – have messaged Alex to confirm) expands inclusion beyond winners of the regional bowls to all NHSEB participants(!).  May 8th UPDATE: Alex confirmed — the new online resources are open to all NHSEB Regional participants! Kudos to UNC for making these changes to sustain (and grow!) ethics bowl during this challenging age of COVID.

I hope you are all staying safe and healthy during what is shaping up to be a challenging time for us all.  

My team at the Parr Center and I have been working hard in the past few weeks to bring parts of the NHSEB experience online in the wake of the cancellation of our National Competition due to COVID-19. Today, I’m thrilled to introduce you to NHSEBOnline, a new slate of programming to engage our students virtually and keep up the conversations that make our activity what it is.  

The program will include three central initiatives: (1) asynchronous online Discussion Threads which allow students to engage each other in conversation about an abridged Case Set via video, audio, and text-based messaging, (2) weekly Group “Huddles” where students can discuss problems and prospects with NHSEB staff and volunteer organizers via videoconference, and finally (3) a virtual Ethics Bowl Summit in late May which will bring together students, organizers, volunteers, and parents from across the country to recognize and feature our National Finalists, celebrate with all of our students, and close out the 2019-2020 season! More information about format and scheduling for the Summit will be released in the coming weeks.   I hope you’ll share this message and the video above with your coaches and students. Registration for participants is now open. We are also continually looking for volunteer organizers to help out with the administration of the program and planning for the end of the year. Your help is most welcome! Conversation is the essence of this activity, and I’m so excited to see it continue, particularly during the complex and challenging times we find ourselves in.

I hope you’ll join us in this experiment, and encourage your students and coaches to do the same.

Alex Richardson,  Director, National High School Ethics Bowl, Parr Center for Ethics, UNC Chapel Hill

Case Analysis and Team Organization Forms

Inspired by a recent Case Summary Matrix post, Vancouver, Washington HSEB coach and regular EthicsBowl.org contributor Michael Andersen reached out to share two very nice related tools: a Case Analysis Form and a Team Organization Form.

The Case Analysis form has three columns on each of three pages, with three of the below categories on each:

  • Central moral dimensions in this case  / values or principles in conflict–as related in the case description, or reasonably inferred from it
  • Who cares? / Different viewpoints, worldviews engaged with this case (i.e., stakeholders)
  • How do these parties appear to evaluate the moral problem(s) of the case? (and from what ethical framework, using what key language?)
  • What exactly does each stakeholder argue? List underlying premises (their reasons, assumptions) and their conclusion.  Check for valid / sound reasoning.
  • Most relevant fact claims that we need to research in each party’s argument.  Is their supporting evidence from reliable sources?
  • Most likely counter-arguments (include supporting evidence &  reasoning)
  • What exactly will we argue? List underlying premises (our reason and assumptions) and our conclusion.  Check for valid / sound reasoning.
  • Most relevant fact claims that we need to research to support our argument. Are our sources for this evidence reliable?
  • Most likely counter-arguments we will encounter + our responses

Page 1, for example, looks like this:

Engaging prompts, inspiring the critical thought and identification of key details that make for a quality analysis. A smart approach for sure.

The idea behind the second resource, the Team Organization Form, is to proactively assign team members various responsibilities so a) they know how to concentrate during prep, and b) they can confidently operate within their realm of expertise and comfort during the bowl.

As Michael explains it, “You’ll notice that for each team member there is a split column under their name. The first side of the column is to record the role code (key at bottom) if they are the Presenting Team on a given case; the second side is to record the role code if they are the Commentary Team on a given case. Using this form, students can see on one page what their particular roles are across the array of cases assigned for the Ethics Bowl.”

“I intended this as a stress-reducer tool, as team members have fewer roles for which they are ‘on point’ for the cases (as opposed to feeling that they have to master all of the responsibilities for every case). Of course, this tool is only useful for teams that decide to divide their responsibilities such that every team member (roughly) has a role to play for all the cases encountered–as opposed to teams who split responsibilities by assigning whole cases to particular team members.” Looks like this:

Two very thoughtful and sophisticated resources — if you’d like an editable version of either, just email (matt (at) mattdeaton.com). And thanks again, Michael, for the valuable contributions! Sharing reusable tools such as these is definitely consistent with the collaborative, cooperative spirit of ethics bowl. I suspect ethics bowl creator Bob Ladenson would give you two enthusiastic thumbs up 🙂

New HSEB Judge Training Vid

“The cases that the students are discussing present moral issues as they are in real life… complex, ambiguous, controversial, difficult,  and ultimately quite messy. There are often no easy answers.”

Courtesy Dr. Stephen Michelman of the South Carolina High School Ethics Bowl at Wofford College, above and on the Resources page you’ll find a brand new judge training video featuring Parr Center Director of Outreach, UNC teaching assistant professor, longtime ethics bowl enthusiast, and all-around swell guy, Steven Swartzer.

Steve knows his stuff, is especially eloquent in this vid, and the overview he provides and questions he answers would be useful for anyone interested in ethics bowl. So check it out — invaluable info for an aspiring judge, coach, moderator or competitor.

Many thanks to Dr. Michelman  and company for recording, producing and sharing this with the ethics bowl community.

And coaches, if you’re having a hard time getting your team on the same page, take heart. As Steve concedes, “We try to write cases that are designed to elicit disagreement.” 

Oh, and another gem from the Q&A section (especially useful if you’re a new ethics coach with experience in debate), a judge asks how to score teams that change their position after commentary from the opposing team (or during the judges interaction period, for that matter). Steve’s response: “In debate, if you change your mind, I guess you lose… That’s not what happens here, necessarily. It’s actually sometimes a sign of mature moral thinking to say, ‘Oh, you know what? I think that that point was really excellent and I think that it does… seriously call into question at least some part of [our initial view]. So changing their mind is not necessarily a bad thing… Or, on the other side, are they moving too easily to accommodate something that might not be [a quality objection].”

Ethics in a Nutshell: An Intro for Ethics Bowlers Third Edition (now with YouTube lectures)

An October, 2018 revision to my classic primer for ethics bowlers — now updated with video lectures on each of the chapters — is available in PDF on our Resources page and and via direct link here. Used by ethics bowl teams from coast to coast, it’s accessible, concise (only 60 pages), and contains all the philosophical ethics essentials: differences between morality and psychology/legality, how to build and analyze arguments by analogy, the four dominant ethics theories, the (legit, essential) role of our moral intuitions, and much more.

For class and other non-ethics bowl purposes, find the revised and expanded paperback edition at Amazon for less than $10 here. It’s similar to this 3rd ethics bowler edition, with several sections rewritten for clarity and impact, formatted for fewer words per page, lecture notes on each chapter at the end, and with a beautiful cover by ethics bowl supporter and artist, Ashley Addair.

But for ethics bowl-related purposes, the PDF version hosted here at EthicsBowl.org is completely free – my gift to the ethics bowl community. Print it, email it, host it on your team’s website – whatever you like.

Visit EthicsinaNutshell.org for the vids, sample reflection questions, sample syllabi and other resources.

Hoping you and your team find Nutshell useful, and special thanks to all the volunteers who helped improve editions 1 and 2,
Matt