2026-2027 IEB Regional Case Set Live, Registration Open

Wednesday at noon the brand new Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl case set was released by APPE. Skimming just now, there are cool cases on:

  • AI-autonomous weapons
  • Looksmaxxing
  • Polymarket gambling
  • Veiled calls for political violence
  • Calls to repatriate the Rosetta Stone from the British Museum to Egypt
  • More!

Registration is also open, with a limited number of slots available at each event. I’ve already registered my college team for the Ohio River Valley IEB regional to be hosted by the University of Cincinnati early December. And since the NHSEB case set isn’t yet live, I’ve dogeared two cases for my high school team to discuss at our weekly practice this afternoon: #7, “Equal Access Activism,” about accommodating the hearing-impaired at drive throughs, as well as #10, “To Be, or Not to Be…Forgotten?” about governments and platforms removing our online footprints by default and/or upon request.

Thanks to the good folks at APPE, IEB leadership, IEB regional organizers, and the IEB case writing committee for all the behind-the-scenes work this requires! If you’d like to register your team, browse regional options, or download the case set, visit APPE’s IEB site.

Fall 2026 TKEthics Events: Invitationals, an Arizona In-Person Regional, Case Writing, and AI Debates

Dear Ethics Bowl community,

As the fall season gets going, the Modus Ponens Institute and TKEthics have a full slate of events open to teams everywhere, and as always, our format is almost identical to Ethics Bowl: the same style of case, the same collaborative-dialogue scoring, the same emphasis on reasoning over point-scoring. Teams that prep for NHSEB will feel right at home.

TKEthics Fall Invitational, Saturday, November 7 (online)
Our flagship online event. Teams of 3 to 5 discuss six real-world tech-and-ethics cases across four judged rounds, with feedback after each. $225 per team, or $180 with the early bird through September 7. Qualifier for the TKEthics International Grand Final. Invitation and details

Arizona In-Person Regional, Saturday, October 10 (Chandler, AZ)
Our first in-person tournament in the Southwest, at Arizona College Prep in Chandler. A full day of ethics-bowl-style dialogue for teams who can attend in person. Marc Sanders Foundation scholarships available. Registration closes September 10. Invitation and details

Middle School Pan Atlantic Ethics Olympiad, Saturday, November 14 (online)
For teams of 11-to-14-year-olds. Same format, age-appropriate cases, an official qualifier toward the international middle school circuit. Register

Marc Sanders Case Writing Prize, deadline September 30
Free to enter. High school students submit an original case at the intersection of technology and ethics. $1,500 in prizes: $1,000 to winning schools, $500 to student authors, and winning cases feature in the Fall Invitational case set, so your students can write a case the whole field then discusses. Marc Sanders Case Writing Prize

Global AI Debates, Fall 2026
Our speech-and-debate program on the ethics and governance of AI, judged by professionals from MIT, OpenAI, and UC Berkeley. Submissions due November 14, live finals December 5, $3,500 prize pool. globalaidebates.com

All our case sets are freely available at our case sets page, and coaches are welcome to use them as classroom or scrimmage material whether or not your teams compete. Questions or interest, reach me any time at astapleton@modusponensinstitute.com.

Kind regards,
Archie Stapleton
Co-founder, Director: Modus Ponens Institute
Outreach Director: TKEthics.org
Phone #: 857-320-1778

Free Zoom-Based Ethics Bowl Workshop Today and Tomorrow

Reminder that the summer Ethics Bowl workshop hosted by APPE and IEB leadership will begin this evening with an “ABC’s of Ethics Bowl” overview from 4-5 EST, then pick back up Saturday at 11:30 through 6:30, with attendees welcome to pop in and out as desired. Here are the details shared via email earlier today.

The ABCs of the Ethics Bowl: If you are new to the Ethics Bowl or thinking of starting a team, you will benefit tremendously from the ABCs of the Ethics Bowl, presented by Richard Greene and Rachel Robison-Greene. If you’re joining this session, please watch the videos (found here) before the workshop, and plan to join us today for Q&A. 

Saturday’s Agenda: Sessions 1, 2, 3, and 7 are plenary sessions. Sessions 4, 5, and 6 contain concurrent sessions. Participants are welcome to attend any session that they like, but the concurrent sessions have been grouped into tracks which one might find useful to follow depending on one’s role, interest, and level of Ethics Bowl experience.

Track 1: Ethics Bowl in the Classroom: Teachers across the country use Ethics Bowl cases and debates in different ways pedagogically. This track will explore different approaches to using Ethics Bowl in a class.

Track 2: Producing the Bowl: This track focuses on the myriad of issues involved in putting on an ethics bowl.

Track 3: Engaging the World: This track focuses on the relationship between the Ethics Bowl and the world in which we currently live.

Free registration is closed, but I bet if you reached out to APPE Executive Director Kristen Fuhs Wells at kristen (at) appe-ethics.org she’d hook you up with links to the sessions. Thanks to everyone involved and looking forward!

Ethics Bowl Advice from William & Mary’s IEB-Winning Captain

This past March, an especially talented team from William & Mary in Virginia won IEB nationals in St. Louis. I happened to run into their faculty sponsor, Tim Sommers (who studied under one of my philosophical heroes, John Rawls) in the parking garage afterwards, and was amazed to learn that the team didn’t have an official “coach,” only a faculty sponsor. So I reached out to team captain, Bernardo Jimenez, to get the backstory and see if he might have any advice for other teams. Bernardo was gracious enough to share the following article and pictures. Congrats to the entire W&M philosophy and Ethics Bowl program, and thanks so much for the awesome guest article!

I got into Ethics Bowl eight years ago as a high school freshman through NHSEB, where my school’s wonderful teacher, Ms. Way, had run a successful program for years. I imagined myself as fond of anything that involved philosophy back then, and in this case, I happened to be right. I had to learn some tough lessons about discipline and hard work during that time—I didn’t compete for the team until my junior year. By my senior year, though, I was one of the team’s main competitors, and we had an amazing year, placing 5th at the national competition. At that point, I had fallen in love with Ethics Bowl forever.

I got into college Ethics Bowl on the back of dissatisfaction from coming close to but not winning the national competition—I felt like I had unfinished business and could learn even more lessons from this amazing activity. The whole idea of starting a team on my own at William & Mary still might not have gotten off the ground without some great luck; somehow, I made it to the national competition competing solo my freshman year. After that, my buddy Sam came on, and we were a team of two for a while. Later, we got a faculty coach in addition to myself (Professor Tim Sommers), recruited new members, and everything of course culminated in winning of the APPE IEB this spring. Out of everything I ever did in Ethics Bowl, I have to say that learning how to coach a big team was the hardest—shoutout to all the amazing coaches who might be reading this! I don’t know how you all do it every year!

I think there are so many amazing, obvious benefits of Ethics Bowl. For many competitive young people like me, it’s a great chance to direct your energy into something that develops your reasoning and speaking skills alongside your moral compass. The main goal of Ethics Bowl is not winning, of course, but the competitive aspect draws many people in who would otherwise not engage and allows them to become far more considerate and thoughtful than they otherwise would have. For me and many others, though, I think the biggest benefit of Ethics Bowl is its ability to target “black and white” worldviews. I came into Ethics Bowl in high school thinking that I knew everything and that my views were obviously correct. If someone disagreed with me, then they were wrong. That was that. There was no middle ground or gray area. But year after year of this competition has given me an understanding of why other people think the way they do. I’ve been reminded so often that there are great arguments for and against essentially any seriousposition. I’ve learned that it’s harder to genuinelyput yourself in other people’s shoes than most people think. And in a time where having the most polarizing view is socially rewarded, striving for consensus and having a healthy uncertainty about your own views of the world is so hard. How lucky I was to have Ethics Bowl teaching me the value of those things, and guiding me towards the truth! 

If I had to give other teams advice to help them be more successful, the first thing I would say would be to not make too much out of individual wins and losses. I always caution my teammates from making too much out of one match or even one competition. In the words of NBA coach Gregg Poppovich, “When you win, you’re never as good as you thought you were, and when you lose, you’re never as bad.” Ultimately, just like any other competition, what happens in a single round of Ethics Bowl is often quite random. It’s much more productive to focus on the things you can control—after all, any 2-1 split between judges could have easily gone the other way. Even the littlest things, then, clearly do matter. A second piece of advice would be that answering the question goes beyond simply answering it at the beginning. I have noticed that a lot of teams directly answer the question they are given in their introduction and then proceed to give a presentation that answers the overall case rather than the specific question given to them. Competing teams, I think, are understandably more prepared for a general response to each case. But if you are a judge, you haven’t practiced general presentations on each case for months. The question in front of you is probably the thing that stands out most, so it’s important as a team to stick to the question that was actually asked. The last bit of advice I’d have stems from the fact that I’m a double major in economics and philosophy. My economics knowledge has come in handy to save the day so many times during rounds, especially during judges’ questions. Multi-disciplinary knowledge is so important in Ethics Bowl—especially in close rounds that end up being decided by just a point or two. That being said, I notice a lot of teams, even successful ones at nationals, struggle when asked foundational philosophical questions about the ethical concepts they use. In my humble opinion, it’s pretty hard to consistently win at nationals without having at least one or two team members well-versed in basic philosophical theory. 

As for what’s next for me, I will begin working in international tax later this summer in Miami following my graduation. My job will require lots of writing and verbal communication, skills that Ethics Bowl was incredibly important in developing for me. I’ll probably still help out my old William & Mary teammates here and there post-graduation, but if any colleges or tournament organizers in South Florida want a coach or assistant, reach out! Although my days of competing are over, I look forward to helping Ethics Bowl grow in so many other ways.

Congrats again to W&M and thanks again to Bernardo for the article! If anyone in South Florida would like to put his talents to good use, please reach out and I’d be honored to connect you.

Free Zoom-based Ethics Bowl Workshop July 24-25

The below invitation to the Ethics Bowl community was shared by IEB chair Michael Jordan yesterday. I attended and enjoyed last summer’s workshop, and just registered to attend this summer’s late July – will be presenting that Saturday at 4:30 Eastern, in fact – hope to see you there! Matt

We’re excited to once again host the Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl Summer Workshop on July 24–25. This free, online event is a valuable opportunity for the Ethics Bowl community to come together, share ideas, and build connections. The workshop is designed to be welcoming and useful to both newcomers and long-time participants—whether you’re a coach, organizer, moderator, judge, or student competitor.

Sessions will cover a range of topics relevant to all aspects of the Ethics Bowl, including best practices for coaching, using the ethics bowl in the classroom, organizing a bowl, training judges, case writing, high school ethics bowl, case writing and much more. It’s also a great forum for sharing questions, challenges, and success stories from across the country.

Please share this with the teams, faculty, and volunteers in your region, including students, so that anyone interested in learning more about Ethics Bowl can take part. You can register for the workshop here. 

Remembering Ethics Bowl’s Creator, Bob Ladenson

I’m sorry to share that on May 3rd, Ethics Bowl’s original creator and IEB founder, Dr. Robert Ladenson, passed away at the age of 82. Bob was the epitome of a gentleman scholar, a mentor to many and friend to all. And Ethics Bowl simply would not exist but for his courage and dedication.

Bob had progressively stepped away from direct leadership roles, trusting the next generation to realize his vision and take Ethics Bowl to new heights. But his presence was always felt – his unmistakably charitable and humble character implicit in Ethics Bowl’s rules and culture. For several years IEB and NHSEB have awarded, by peer vote, the Bob Ladenson Spirit of the Ethics Bowl Award, given to the nationals team best embodying:

(1) Respect, civility, and courtesy for others, both during the rounds and informal discussion;

(2) Thoughtfulness, in terms of expressing their positions and commenting on other teams’ presentation; and

(3) Sportsmanship, in terms of valuing collaboration above competition.

These are the core virtues Ethics Bowl strives to foster, and Bob lived them like few others.

Bob’s presence will continue to be felt by those who knew him, and his humble, mindful demeanor will continue to shape Ethics Bowlers around the world for years to come. He’s survived by loving wife of 42 years and Ethics Bowl legend in her own right, Joanne, as well as a brother, two daughters, and four grandchildren. Click here to read his full obituary and leave a note of remembrance.

With the Ladensons in Chicago in 2018 – they generously invited me to stay with them while in town for the annual APPE conference – RIP, Bob!

South Carolina HSEB Champs Win 2026 NHSEB

Photo courtesy Meg Hasten, CCES Director of Strategic Marketing and Communication

Super congrats to Coach Jason Smith and his talented team from Christ Church Episcopal School of Greenville, South Carolina on winning the 2026 National High School Ethics Bowl at UNC. Coach Smith said of his team, “They proved themselves to be exactly the sorts of global citizens that our world needs right now – decisive and principled, but always seeking to honor the dignity of every human being through their compassion and understanding.”

Three cheers for team members Isabella Agnew ’27, Celina Brotherton ’27, Jerry Gan ’27, Jonathan Thompson ’27 and Max Delfino ’29, as well as alternates Owen Gregory ’26, Wrigley Valle ’26, Amanda de Leon ’26, and Fin Adams-Riley ’28.

Ethics Bowl of course isn’t about winning. But it’s the events that push teams to put in the work to grow, and this group’s recognition is definitely well-deserved. Enjoy!

What Is Patriotism Journal Opportunity for High Schoolers

Questions is a peer reviewed philosophy journal run by P.L.A.T.O. and the Philosophy Documentation Center that publishes research-length articles by high schoolers. They’re accepting submissions for an upcoming issue through April 30th  and the theme this year is “What is Patriotism?”

Given America’s domestic unrest and war in Iran, it’s is an especially important time to consider the nature and value of patriotism. And who better to think carefully about that than young philosophers?

Learn more about Questions here and check out submission details below and here – thanks to Ethics Bowl supporter Andrew Liu for sharing the opportunity.

Household Voting Bonus Case

This morning I came across a NYT article on “household voting” where women defer to their husbands at the ballot box. Apparently this isn’t something supporters want to limit to their individual choices, but a policy proposal to impose on broader America.

The timing of the article was nice because this afternoon I’ll be discussing the role of religious reasoning in public discussions on abortion with my Ethics students. So I fired up ChatGPT and worked with it to write the below unofficial bonus Ethics Bowl case. I’ll be covering it with my students in Tennessee this afternoon. Feel free to broach it with your teams and students and share your/their analysis in a comment. And kudos to NYT writer Vivian Yee – read her full original article here.

Ethics Bowl Team Honored on U.S. House Floor

Super congrats to Georgia Southern’s IEB team and team president Cade Huff for their recent successes and the recognition they received from Rep. Buddy Carter on the U.S. House floor. Given that part of the point of Ethics Bowl is to elevate democratic norms, it’s especially encouraging to see it discussed in one of the places we need it most. Ethics Bowlers: consider sharing the good news about your teams and programs with your elected officials. The more they know about what the community is doing, the more pressure they’ll feel to work together to seek principled solutions.