Ethics Bowl Advice from William & Mary’s IEB-Winning Captain

This past March, an especially talented team from William & Mary in Virginia won IEB nationals in St. Louis. I happened to run into their faculty sponsor, Tim Sommers (who studied under one of my philosophical heroes, John Rawls) in the parking garage afterwards, and was amazed to learn that the team didn’t have an official “coach,” only a faculty sponsor. So I reached out to team captain, Bernardo Jimenez, to get the backstory and see if he might have any advice for other teams. Bernardo was gracious enough to share the following article and pictures. Congrats to the entire W&M philosophy and Ethics Bowl program, and thanks so much for the awesome guest article!

I got into Ethics Bowl eight years ago as a high school freshman through NHSEB, where my school’s wonderful teacher, Ms. Way, had run a successful program for years. I imagined myself as fond of anything that involved philosophy back then, and in this case, I happened to be right. I had to learn some tough lessons about discipline and hard work during that time—I didn’t compete for the team until my junior year. By my senior year, though, I was one of the team’s main competitors, and we had an amazing year, placing 5th at the national competition. At that point, I had fallen in love with Ethics Bowl forever.

I got into college Ethics Bowl on the back of dissatisfaction from coming close to but not winning the national competition—I felt like I had unfinished business and could learn even more lessons from this amazing activity. The whole idea of starting a team on my own at William & Mary still might not have gotten off the ground without some great luck; somehow, I made it to the national competition competing solo my freshman year. After that, my buddy Sam came on, and we were a team of two for a while. Later, we got a faculty coach in addition to myself (Professor Tim Sommers), recruited new members, and everything of course culminated in winning of the APPE IEB this spring. Out of everything I ever did in Ethics Bowl, I have to say that learning how to coach a big team was the hardest—shoutout to all the amazing coaches who might be reading this! I don’t know how you all do it every year!

I think there are so many amazing, obvious benefits of Ethics Bowl. For many competitive young people like me, it’s a great chance to direct your energy into something that develops your reasoning and speaking skills alongside your moral compass. The main goal of Ethics Bowl is not winning, of course, but the competitive aspect draws many people in who would otherwise not engage and allows them to become far more considerate and thoughtful than they otherwise would have. For me and many others, though, I think the biggest benefit of Ethics Bowl is its ability to target “black and white” worldviews. I came into Ethics Bowl in high school thinking that I knew everything and that my views were obviously correct. If someone disagreed with me, then they were wrong. That was that. There was no middle ground or gray area. But year after year of this competition has given me an understanding of why other people think the way they do. I’ve been reminded so often that there are great arguments for and against essentially any seriousposition. I’ve learned that it’s harder to genuinelyput yourself in other people’s shoes than most people think. And in a time where having the most polarizing view is socially rewarded, striving for consensus and having a healthy uncertainty about your own views of the world is so hard. How lucky I was to have Ethics Bowl teaching me the value of those things, and guiding me towards the truth! 

If I had to give other teams advice to help them be more successful, the first thing I would say would be to not make too much out of individual wins and losses. I always caution my teammates from making too much out of one match or even one competition. In the words of NBA coach Gregg Poppovich, “When you win, you’re never as good as you thought you were, and when you lose, you’re never as bad.” Ultimately, just like any other competition, what happens in a single round of Ethics Bowl is often quite random. It’s much more productive to focus on the things you can control—after all, any 2-1 split between judges could have easily gone the other way. Even the littlest things, then, clearly do matter. A second piece of advice would be that answering the question goes beyond simply answering it at the beginning. I have noticed that a lot of teams directly answer the question they are given in their introduction and then proceed to give a presentation that answers the overall case rather than the specific question given to them. Competing teams, I think, are understandably more prepared for a general response to each case. But if you are a judge, you haven’t practiced general presentations on each case for months. The question in front of you is probably the thing that stands out most, so it’s important as a team to stick to the question that was actually asked. The last bit of advice I’d have stems from the fact that I’m a double major in economics and philosophy. My economics knowledge has come in handy to save the day so many times during rounds, especially during judges’ questions. Multi-disciplinary knowledge is so important in Ethics Bowl—especially in close rounds that end up being decided by just a point or two. That being said, I notice a lot of teams, even successful ones at nationals, struggle when asked foundational philosophical questions about the ethical concepts they use. In my humble opinion, it’s pretty hard to consistently win at nationals without having at least one or two team members well-versed in basic philosophical theory. 

As for what’s next for me, I will begin working in international tax later this summer in Miami following my graduation. My job will require lots of writing and verbal communication, skills that Ethics Bowl was incredibly important in developing for me. I’ll probably still help out my old William & Mary teammates here and there post-graduation, but if any colleges or tournament organizers in South Florida want a coach or assistant, reach out! Although my days of competing are over, I look forward to helping Ethics Bowl grow in so many other ways.

Congrats again to W&M and thanks again to Bernardo for the article! If anyone in South Florida would like to put his talents to good use, please reach out and I’d be honored to connect you.

Free Zoom-based Ethics Bowl Workshop July 24-25

The below invitation to the Ethics Bowl community was shared by IEB chair Michael Jordan yesterday. I attended and enjoyed last summer’s workshop, and just registered to attend this summer’s late July – will be presenting that Saturday at 4:30 Eastern, in fact – hope to see you there! Matt

We’re excited to once again host the Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl Summer Workshop on July 24–25. This free, online event is a valuable opportunity for the Ethics Bowl community to come together, share ideas, and build connections. The workshop is designed to be welcoming and useful to both newcomers and long-time participants—whether you’re a coach, organizer, moderator, judge, or student competitor.

Sessions will cover a range of topics relevant to all aspects of the Ethics Bowl, including best practices for coaching, using the ethics bowl in the classroom, organizing a bowl, training judges, case writing, high school ethics bowl, case writing and much more. It’s also a great forum for sharing questions, challenges, and success stories from across the country.

Please share this with the teams, faculty, and volunteers in your region, including students, so that anyone interested in learning more about Ethics Bowl can take part. You can register for the workshop here. 

Remembering Ethics Bowl’s Creator, Bob Ladenson

I’m sorry to share that on May 3rd, Ethics Bowl’s original creator and IEB founder, Dr. Robert Ladenson, passed away at the age of 82. Bob was the epitome of a gentleman scholar, a mentor to many and friend to all. And Ethics Bowl simply would not exist but for his courage and dedication.

Bob had progressively stepped away from direct leadership roles, trusting the next generation to realize his vision and take Ethics Bowl to new heights. But his presence was always felt – his unmistakably charitable and humble character implicit in Ethics Bowl’s rules and culture. For several years IEB and NHSEB have awarded, by peer vote, the Bob Ladenson Spirit of the Ethics Bowl Award, given to the nationals team best embodying:

(1) Respect, civility, and courtesy for others, both during the rounds and informal discussion;

(2) Thoughtfulness, in terms of expressing their positions and commenting on other teams’ presentation; and

(3) Sportsmanship, in terms of valuing collaboration above competition.

These are the core virtues Ethics Bowl strives to foster, and Bob lived them like few others.

Bob’s presence will continue to be felt by those who knew him, and his humble, mindful demeanor will continue to shape Ethics Bowlers around the world for years to come. He’s survived by loving wife of 42 years and Ethics Bowl legend in her own right, Joanne, as well as a brother, two daughters, and four grandchildren. Click here to read his full obituary and leave a note of remembrance.

With the Ladensons in Chicago in 2018 – they generously invited me to stay with them while in town for the annual APPE conference – RIP, Bob!

South Carolina HSEB Champs Win 2026 NHSEB

Photo courtesy Meg Hasten, CCES Director of Strategic Marketing and Communication

Super congrats to Coach Jason Smith and his talented team from Christ Church Episcopal School of Greenville, South Carolina on winning the 2026 National High School Ethics Bowl at UNC. Coach Smith said of his team, “They proved themselves to be exactly the sorts of global citizens that our world needs right now – decisive and principled, but always seeking to honor the dignity of every human being through their compassion and understanding.”

Three cheers for team members Isabella Agnew ’27, Celina Brotherton ’27, Jerry Gan ’27, Jonathan Thompson ’27 and Max Delfino ’29, as well as alternates Owen Gregory ’26, Wrigley Valle ’26, Amanda de Leon ’26, and Fin Adams-Riley ’28.

Ethics Bowl of course isn’t about winning. But it’s the events that push teams to put in the work to grow, and this group’s recognition is definitely well-deserved. Enjoy!

What Is Patriotism Journal Opportunity for High Schoolers

Questions is a peer reviewed philosophy journal run by P.L.A.T.O. and the Philosophy Documentation Center that publishes research-length articles by high schoolers. They’re accepting submissions for an upcoming issue through April 30th  and the theme this year is “What is Patriotism?”

Given America’s domestic unrest and war in Iran, it’s is an especially important time to consider the nature and value of patriotism. And who better to think carefully about that than young philosophers?

Learn more about Questions here and check out submission details below and here – thanks to Ethics Bowl supporter Andrew Liu for sharing the opportunity.

Household Voting Bonus Case

This morning I came across a NYT article on “household voting” where women defer to their husbands at the ballot box. Apparently this isn’t something supporters want to limit to their individual choices, but a policy proposal to impose on broader America.

The timing of the article was nice because this afternoon I’ll be discussing the role of religious reasoning in public discussions on abortion with my Ethics students. So I fired up ChatGPT and worked with it to write the below unofficial bonus Ethics Bowl case. I’ll be covering it with my students in Tennessee this afternoon. Feel free to broach it with your teams and students and share your/their analysis in a comment. And kudos to NYT writer Vivian Yee – read her full original article here.

Ethics Bowl Team Honored on U.S. House Floor

Super congrats to Georgia Southern’s IEB team and team president Cade Huff for their recent successes and the recognition they received from Rep. Buddy Carter on the U.S. House floor. Given that part of the point of Ethics Bowl is to elevate democratic norms, it’s especially encouraging to see it discussed in one of the places we need it most. Ethics Bowlers: consider sharing the good news about your teams and programs with your elected officials. The more they know about what the community is doing, the more pressure they’ll feel to work together to seek principled solutions.

IEB Case Survey for Your Classroom

I’ll use Ethics Bowl cases often in my philosophy classes to make theories or journal articles more concrete. But in the final week of my in-person Ethics Intro classes, I’ll divide the students and run a mock Ethics Bowl, inviting current and past team members to judge.

Given time constraints, we can only get through four cases. And while I could handpick topics, I’m already doing that when I set up the syllabus. So, to give my students an opportunity to tackle issues they actually want to tackle, I’ll put the most current cases up for a vote.

Below is the actual announcement I shared this morning, with my simple summaries of the 2026 IEB nationals cases. You’re welcome and encouraged to edit and use this in your classes. Even if you don’t have time for a mock Bowl, simply getting student input on what they want to discuss could lead to more smiles and more fruitful discussion. Set aside 20 minutes at the end of any class, have volunteers take turns reading a case’s paragraphs aloud, then see that they think. Or if you can spare an hour, run a full mock Bowl round. And the beauty is that with a new case set out each fall and each spring, you’ll always have fresh topics, which is true whether you’re using IEB, NHSEB, or MSEB cases. Cheers!

Vote Now for Topics for Last Two Classes

This week we’re discussing various ethical arguments on immigration. Next week we have one reading on the death penalty. Then after taking Exam 2, we’ll shift into a deep dive on abortion ethics for several weeks. But for the final two classes of the semester, we’ll discuss four Ethics Bowl cases on four topics of your choosing. 

Below are my summaries of the cases from the Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl national championships competition held in St. Louis the weekend before last. Please review them now, then click here to vote anytime between now and midnight next Tuesday. 

You can read the cases’ full details here. And choose wisely, because when the final week comes, we’ll use these top four cases according to your votes to run a mock Ethics Bowl. Check out an example of how an Ethics Bowl works here

  • Whether it’s best to respond to injustice through inaction (Socrates), direct resistance (Bonhoeffer), or cooperation (Nazi soldiers). 
  • Whether it’s OK for individuals or companies to disperse materials into the atmosphere to fight against global warming without coordinating with governments. 
  • Whether doctors or medical school students who question the safety and efficacy of vaccines should be allowed to practice or study medicine. 
  • Whether it was OK for a federal agency to display a massive portrait of President Trump on a building facing the National Mall in DC.
  • Whether selective memory erasure (if/when it becomes possible) would be permissible.
  • What to think of reality shows that gamify and make light of sexual consent. 
  • Appropriate regulations on marijuana and extracted THC, the chemical that causes the high, with some possible medical benefits.
  • What to think of schools’ usage of software that monitors students’ online activity, alerting officials to potential suicides and other risks.
  • What to think of fan clubs celebrating Luigi Mangione, the man accused of killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
  • What to think of domestic violence shelters that intend to protect battered women, but also “jail” the victim rather than the perpetrator, and make economic independence difficult.
  • What to think of college student housing policies that segregate students according to sexual orientation, gender, or race.
  • Whether a musician should accept a royalty cut in exchange for her music appearing more often on users’ “personalized” playlists. 
  • What to think of a Canadian policy that allows people to receive suicide assistance when they’re experiencing unbearable mental suffering.
  • Whether it’s ethically permissible for businesspersons to engage in a certain degree of deception or “bluffing” as part of the accepted norms of how business negotiations work. 
  • Whether “ranked choice voting” where voters rank their candidate preferences is ethically better or worse than the typical “winner take all” voting.
  • Whether the environmental, water, and energy costs of Bitcoin and AI Large Language Model servers are outweighed by their benefits. 
  • Whether a hospital should have kept a pregnant woman alive on life support when she suffered blood clots and became brain dead so that her Unborn Developing Human could fully gestate and be born.

Celebrating the 13th Michigan HSEB

For the fifth time in Michigan High School Ethics Bowl history, Ann Arbor Greenhills School secured first place, The Hemlock Cup, and title of Michigan Champs. Second place was won for the first time by Academy of the Sacred Heart, who in Bowl tradition is the guardian of the Keeper of Philosophy Flame trophy.

In addition to the tradition of recognizing seniors, this year we saluted three Bowl coach/teacher advisors all of whom are ending their Bowl tenure and moving on to their next adventure. All have had a vital role in building and establishing the Michigan Bowl from the beginning: Brent Richards from Ann Arbor Pioneer; Mark Randolph from Ann Arbor Greenhills; and Katie Jones from Ann Arbor Huron.

All three teachers can boast Michigan championships. Yet on Bowl weekend, the open-mindedness, care and curiosity, intelligence, integrity and influence of each of these lovely human beings were highlighted by current team members and alumni. Student reflections, memories and stories of gratitude were in the air everywhere, making the 2026 Bowl an acknowledgment of the enduring power of teachers who discover the singular abilities and promise of all young people.

A2Ethics volunteers join students in acknowledging their teachers’ generosity, daring, resilience and–their sense of fun and good humor. Indeed, we think their school nicknames reflect collectively a few of their best attributes: they are Pioneers in helping to start the Michigan Bowl. They are Gryphons (Greenhills) whose mythical reputation embraces wisdom and loyalty. And they are (Huron) River Rats in its meaning as those who live along rivers—and have the traits of self-reliance, an indomitable spirit—and they appreciate quick drying shorts!

Extended Interview with Archie Stapleton

Special thanks to Archie Stapleton of the Modus Ponens Institute and TKEthics for the superb extended interview with Yours Truly. If you have the time and interest, check out the whole thing. Otherwise, Archie has kindly hyperlinked to the various topics, so feel free to jump straight to the section on the critique that philosophy encourages indecision, or my take on the role of religious moral reasoning in Ethics Bowl (and the public sphere generally), or on metaethics (in what way do moral claims have objective truth values – more on my thoughts on that here), or AI in education and Ethics Bowl. Enjoy!

00:00 Who Is Dr. Deaton? + Ethics Bowl to the Rescue

01:37 How Dr. Deaton Got Into Philosophy

05:17 What Is Ethics Bowl?

08:42 Saving Democracy by Transforming Debate

12:11 Is Philosophy Too Passive?

16:20 Religious Reasoning in Ethics Bowl

25:25 Metaethics: Are Moral Claims True?

35:30 Nihilism, Free Will, and Moral Meaning

39:16 AI Ethics: Superintelligence & Alignment

47:25 AI in Education: Cheating & Assessment

53:38 Should Ethics Bowl Teams Use AI?

55:54 Case Analysis: Professor Using ChatGPT

1:03:16 Do Ethical Theories Belong in Competition?

1:10:27 Is It Wrong for Professors to Use AI?

1:15:30 AI in Essay Competitions

1:20:13 What’s Next for MPI & TKEthics?

1:23:31 Closing Thoughts